0 comments
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Comments!
Hi Miss li!
There was something wrong with Nilofar's blog! So this is my comment to her post on the handmaid's tale! Also sorry that the blog was locked earlier on, I was experiencing some technical difficulties thus was only able unlock it now! Hi Nilofar!(: After reading your blog post on the reflection of the Handmaid's Tale, I began to understand it a lot better with reference to how it relates to Jonas' society. Unfortunately, I did not have the chance to watch this movie thus from what I have read, I feel that it seems like we are reverting back in time as compared to moving forward in this movie. As you have pointed out, in this society the women basically have no rights at all, they are treated like property whose only purpose is to produce the future generation. Very similar to how in the past women were only allowed to stay at home to be homemakers and ensure that the children were taken care of. I find this rather funny and ironic because it was from the past how women have made such significant progress to be of equal status as compared to that of men. However in this movie, they are being treated as a form of property. Although admittedly it is in the best of interest for the society to have such a practise, it is inexcusable to treat women in such a manner. I am sure that there will always be another solution to solve the problem without having to resort to such horrible means. The alternative to this may not be as good as one hopes it to be but in my opinion I value the rights of these women over anything else. It is important that we respect this and is why since the 1900s women have been rewarded with their fundamental rights. From what you have said, I honestly sympathize with these women! They had no say or choice in the matter and yet are being treated like property. Just from your reading I feel the pain for these women and what they had to go through honestly is a scary thought. Thus this has made me even more appreciative of the current world that we live in!(:
Annette
More Dicussions
Some time ago while we were discussing the Giver, Miss li was telling us about a specific Utopian society that existed in the past. I found it relatively interesting, thus decided to research more on that society and I was taken aback by what I discovered. The community was named the Oneida Community and surprisingly it existed for a total of about 40 years. This community was very similar to that of Jonas' society in the sense that it hope to achieve a Utopian community. For example, in the Oneida community there was the practice of complex marriage. Whereby young male teenagers were only able to wed postmenopausal women and young teenage girls were only able to wed elder seniors. This was done in order to prevent accidental pregnancies. Similar to how Jonas' society had a elder of communities to decide the job vocation of youths in order to prevent them from making the wrong choices in life.
After uncovering such a scary fact, I sympathized with the people of the past because they were able to live in such a society where everything was restricted. Let alone have a thriving community where the population continued to grow in spite of this. I can never imagine myself living in such a world where everyone was so sheltered from the reality of life. These people have never been able to see the reality of the outside world and have been kept away like that of the people living in Jonas' community. An example of this would be John Humphrey Noyes, the founder of the Oneida Community. He was unable to deal with his own weaknesses such as his insecurity with women or his shyness. Thus he decided to run away from this by constructing the Oneida Community, to make them acceptable in a society that did not see them as downfalls. This was John Humphrey Noyes' way of running away from reality to live in a "fake world" that he created for himself because he way unable to accept his downfalls. However it is ironic how the harder an individual tries to achieve a Utopian world, do more dystopian factors start to arise. For example, in the Giver when Jonas discovered the truth, he started to feel like he was being oppressed and thus resented this. Also, in the Oneida community it began to decline massively because the younger members started to be affected by the outside world. Therefore, they no longer shared the same sentiments as their founder John Humphrey Noyes. But rather, the need for personal and individual development was beginning to show and finally led to the dissolve of the Oneida Community in 1881. This shows that it is only a matter of time before the truth is being revealed to the society and the members realize that it is not their Utopia any longer. Therefore, it is essential that we learn to accept our downfalls because sooner or later we are going to have to stop living in our "fake world" to face the reality of life. A Utopian society will never be able to exist like that of Jonas' community and the Oneida Community. A more modern example of how a Utopian society cannot exist would be communism which alike aimed for the idea of equality of some sort. However, in this day and age the idea of communism fails to exist as well. Which is why I believe that we have to accept our downfalls in life and learn to pick ourselves up and not try to run away from these problems but rather face them head on!
0 comments
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Photo Montage
This one photo encapsulates the main themes as well as symbols that were brought out in The Giver. Firstly, it would be the idea of "sameness" which is a theme constantly being emphasized throughout the book. The children of different races, twins as well as the colourless trees bring out the theme of "sameness". Jonas' community tries so hard to achieve this element, however from the first two pictures, it shows that being different is not necessarily a bad thing to have because we can live harmoniously together despite being of different races. The third picture shows us a very sad aspect, a community without colour and life to bring out the idea of "sameness" in Jonas’ community
1 comments
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
The giver and my life
Throughout the course of these few weeks of studying the giver and reflecting upon the deeper meaning that it brings out, a theme that was highlighted in the book related very much to my own life. This was something unnoticed at first however upon further reflection, did I start to notice this seemingly minute detail.
One of the main themes in the Giver is the importance of memory. All throughout the book, it is constantly emphasized that without memory, there is no pain in life that we can ever experience. We cannot be plagued by regret or grief if we were unable to remember the event that brought about such a emotion or feeling. Thus in the Giver, it has been decided that the community should eliminate all pain by giving up their society’s collective experiences. This was done through designating the job of the Receiver to remember the memories for the community because the importance of memories was still recognized. This let me reflect upon how many a times in my own life, I myself would wish that I was able to forget certain memories of life. For example those that made me feel sad, angry or depressed to eliminate the pain that these memories brought about, very much similar to that of Jonas' community. However, after giving much thought to it, I realized that having these memories of pain is when we are able to learn from our mistakes. Without the memories we will continue to face the same problems in life and never learn how to overcome them. Thus, I realized that these horrible memories I hold of my own life, is something that I treasure very much. Unlike before when I was all ready to give them up to forget the pain that came with these memories because from these memories, it is when I am able to learn from my mistakes, it is when I am able to grow as a person. More than that, without memories, we will never be able to remember the happy memories that we have experienced. Something like memory comes in 2 forms, those that bring pain and those that bring pleasure. We cannot always look on the negative side of things, because with memories comes happiness as well which is something I will never be ready to give up. Without memories, life seems to be filled with no meaning or purpose. This was something that Jonas realized as well as he went through his training as the Receiver which was why resented this to run away. Thus, after much thought and reflection, my memories are definitely here to stay to learn, grow as well as appreciate what they bring!
0 comments
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Discussions
Over these past few weeks, The Giver has been our main topic of discussion and something brought up on the idea of sameness caught my attention. Throughout The Giver, it is shown that the society strives for every one to be equal and treated the same. This is reflected through the strict rules that the society has implemented whereby an individual would be seen as rude if they were to talk about others being different in one sense or another, showing how much emphasis is being placed on being the same throughout society.
However, through these discussions, I have come to realize that we will never ever be able to achieve this idea of sameness, no matter how much we try to bring this idea about. For example, as seen in The Giver, the job of being a birth mother was looked down upon by other members in society. This was brought to an extent when Lily was scolded for hoping to be a birth mother when she was given her assignment. This simple example shows that there will never be true equality in society. Another example which hit me, was how Jonas was chosen to be the Receiver because this assignment was different from any other assignment. He was isolated from his peers and had to lead a different life of loneliness because of his assignment, which is ironic being that Jonas was living in a society that hoped to achieve sameness. Therefore this idea of sameness is one that is very vague and idealistic because the truth of the matter is that we will never be able to achieve this. Being different from everyone is not necessarily a bad thing, but rather it just makes up who we are as people. No doubt, the idea of sameness is something good to have so as to prevent things like discrimination, but I personally believe that being different is perfectly fine. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions about certain matters, and we are in no position to dictate that, but rather, just learn to accept people's differences as an individual.
0 comments
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Initial Response
The Giver's context of a perfect Utopian world, let me appreciate the current world that we live in where there is colour, love, happiness and other emotions which makes up the part and parcel of life. If life was always smooth sailing and everything was provided for, we wouldn't learn to provide for ourselves and appreciate life for what it really was. For example, towards the end of the book when Jonas was faced with difficulties like starvation and drought, he learned to appreciate the times when food and water was always provided for at every single meal. In the same way, I look at the difficulties in life as opportunities for us to grow and learn as people and is what makes us stronger everyday. Although they are painful at times as shown in the book, there are always the moments in life when we are happy and we learn to appreciate and enjoy those times even more. Living in a world of darkness like Jonas and his family, not knowing the true meaning of life honestly is a scary sight for me to imagine.
Another interesting part of the book which caught my attention was the idea of having a committee to decide your job as an adult. I believe that as long as someone sets their mind to something, nothing is impossible. Although as people we may be more suited for certain jobs, at the end of the day it is still our choice to make because its the basic respect that we can give to every individual in society. Through hard work, every individual will be able to accomplish that job. Furthermore if we never gave people the chance or opportunity to make a mistake, we will never ever learn in life because its from these mistakes that we learn and become wiser as people. This is something I myself can relate to, because right now I am striving very hard to become a lawyer which is something I may not be suited for. Therefore it is also the reason why I am working so hard in both academics and in my co-curricular activity to ensure that I can become a good lawyer when I become an adult. Although I may not be the best person for the job, I believe hard work makes up for everything thus every individual should be given this opportunity to choose what they want in life. Overall, after reading this book, it really gave me quite a substantial number of things to ponder about, if whether I myself would have wanted to live in such a Utopian society. However at the end of the day after giving much thought to it, I appreciate the current world that we live in more than I ever have before. |
|